All victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor communities
A five-month investigation has named 13 previously unidentified victims of US attacks on boats allegedly carrying narcotics in a campaign that has killed nearly 200 people in the Caribbean and the eastern Pacific.
It is unclear if the US has ever identified any of its 194 victims before attacking them, and the names of just three had previously emerged, after their families launched legal cases against the White House.
So the bottom line is all victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor. Wonder how this will land.
Think about it: all victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor. That speaks volumes.
Reading that all victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor — hard to argue with the logic there.
If all victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor, then the bigger picture starts to look very different.
200 people — and that is probably just the official count.
200 people. The real figures are likely much higher.
The fact that all victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor really puts things into perspective.
All victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor. Meanwhile all victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor.
Still waiting to hear what White House actually plans to do about it.
The bigger issue here is all victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor. That changes the calculation.
Hard to look at 200 people and not question the official narrative.
When you look at all victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor, the implications are hard to ignore.
On one hand all victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor. But at the same time all victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor.
Considering all victims of US strikes in eastern Pacific and the Caribbean identified so far came from extremely poor, it raises some real questions about what happens next.
200 people is hard to ignore, no matter which side you are on.