Federal funding for Trump’s $400m ballroom in jeopardy after Senate ruling
Proposal to fund $1bn in security additions for White House campus and president’s new ballroom fails to meet procedural rules
A US Senate official on Saturday removed security funding that could be used for Donald Trump’s planned $400m White House ballroom from a massive spending package, Democratic lawmakers said, imperiling Republican efforts to devote taxpayer money to the contentious project.
The decision by the Senate’s parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, deals a blow to Trump and his administration, which has sought the money for security purposes related to the ballroom.
Trump has said construction of the ballroom will be funded by private donors. But Senate Republicans are seeking $1bn in taxpayer funding to the Secret Service for security upgrades, including the ballroom.
The parliamentarian interprets Senate rules, including whether legislative provisions are permitted. Trump’s fellow Republicans control the Senate, and they still could revise the legislation to try to gain the parliamentarian’s approval. If they do not succeed, they may be unable to include the ballroom-related funding in a $72bn spending package they plan to bring to a vote on the Senate floor, with passage expected on a party-line vote with Democrats opposed. The bulk of the legislation is devoted to immigration enforcement.
The Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, took credit for the ruling after Democrats argued to the parliamentarian that the security money doesn’t belong in the bill.
“Republicans tried to make taxpayers foot the bill for Trump’s billion-dollar ballroom,” Schumer said on Saturday evening. “Senate Democrats fought back – and blew up their first attempt.”
Schumer added that Democrats “will be ready to stop them again” as Republicans say they will revise the bill.
Republicans are invoking complex budget rules to secure passage without any Democratic support. Democrats have opposed funding for Trump’s signature immigration crackdown absent reforms they have sought since federal immigration agents killed US citizens in separate incidents in Minnesota in January.
Republicans hold a 53-47 majority in the Senate, leaving them short of the 60 votes needed to pass most legislation under the chamber’s rules. Democrats have criticized the ballroom as an expensive and frivolous diversion by Trump at a time when Americans face rising costs such as higher fuel prices.
Trump has written on social media that it will be “the finest Building of its kind anywhere in the World”.
Republicans have said the ballroom-related spending they are pursuing is needed to ensure presidential safety, citing an April incident in which a gunman tried to storm a black-tie media gala in Washington that Trump attended.
The administration has said the ballroom will modernize infrastructure, bolster security and ease strain on the White House, which often relies on temporary outdoor structures to host large events. Trump has said the ballroom will be completed around September 2028, near the end of his second term in office.
Democrats, hoping to win control of Congress in November’s midterm elections, are seizing on Republican support of the ballroom to portray Trump’s party as out of touch with the cost-of-living concerns of Americans at a time of rising energy costs driven by the Iran war he launched in February.
Trump last year ordered the demolition of the White House’s East Wing – originally constructed in 1902 during Teddy Roosevelt’s presidency and expanded four decades later during Franklin Roosevelt’s presidency – to make way for his ballroom.
The National Trust for Historic Preservation, a nonprofit organization, then filed a lawsuit challenging the project, arguing that neither the president nor the National Park Service, which manages the White House grounds, possessed the authority to tear down the historic structure or erect a major new facility without explicit congressional approval.
A US appeals court in April allowed construction to continue after the judge handling the National Trust lawsuit issued an order halting the project.
With Reuters and Associated Press
On one hand the Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, took credit for the ruling after Democrats argued to the parliamentarian that the security money doesn’t belong in the bill. But at the same time proposal to fund $1bn in security additions for White House campus and president’s new ballroom fails to meet procedural.
Considering proposal to fund $1bn in security additions for White House campus and president’s new ballroom fails to meet procedural, it raises some real questions about what happens next.
The bigger issue here is the parliamentarian interprets Senate rules, including whether legislative provisions are permitted. That changes the calculation.
Reading that proposal to fund $1bn in security additions for White House campus and president’s new ballroom fails to meet procedural — hard to argue with the logic there.
When you look at trump has said construction of the ballroom will be funded by private donors, the implications are hard to ignore.
The fact that trump has said construction of the ballroom will be funded by private donors really puts things into perspective.
What stands out is trump has said construction of the ballroom will be funded by private donors. That is the part worth paying attention to.
The fact that the Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, took credit for the ruling after Democrats argued to the parliamentarian that the security money doesn’t belong in the bill really puts things into perspective.
If the Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, took credit for the ruling after Democrats argued to the parliamentarian that the security money doesn’t belong in the bill, then the bigger picture starts to look very different.
Secret Service is in a tough spot here, curious how they navigate it.
Still waiting to hear what Secret Service actually plans to do about it.
Considering the parliamentarian interprets Senate rules, including whether legislative provisions are permitted, it raises some real questions about what happens next.
Considering trump has said construction of the ballroom will be funded by private donors, it raises some real questions about what happens next.
Basically the parliamentarian interprets Senate rules, including whether legislative provisions are permitted. What matters is whether anything changes because of it.
If the decision by the Senate’s parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, deals a blow to Trump and his administration, which has sought the money for security purposes related to the ballroom, then the bigger picture starts to look very different.