Trial of US priest charged with sexual assault begins with jury selection in Texas
Anthony Odiong, accused of sexually abusing three female congregants in Waco,faces a maximum of 20 years in prison per charge
The criminal trial of a Roman Catholic priest who ministered in Texas and south-east Louisiana and was charged with illicitly abusing his status as a clergyman to pursue sex with spiritually vulnerable female congregants began on Tuesday with jury selection.
Anthony Odiong, 57, faces charges of sexual assault in a state courthouse in Waco, Texas, involving three women whom he met while working there.
He could receive between two and 20 years in prison – as well as a maximum $10,000 fine – on each charge if he is convicted at the end of a trial that could last a week or more.
The charges against Odiong were effectively prompted by a February 2024 report from the Guardian about women who accused him of sexual coercion, unwanted touching and abusive financial control after meeting him in his capacity as a priest.
A woman whom the Guardian did not interview subsequently brought a copy of the outlet’s story on Odiong to Waco police and reported that he had sexually assaulted her in 2012. Investigators subsequently identified as many as 10 women whom Odiong was suspected of sexually preying on after meeting them over the years while ministering in Texas as well as the New Orleans archdiocese.
Prosecutors eventually managed to charge Odiong with exploiting three women’s “emotional dependency upon him as a spiritual adviser and engaging in sexual conduct with them” because Texas law classifies that alleged conduct as a felony. Those women include the one who reported Odiong to Waco police; another whom the Guardian interviewed in its piece; and a third whom officers identified through messages recovered during the ensuing investigation.
Many of those women’s cases, including ones from Louisiana, did not yield criminal counts. But Waco prosecutors contend that his having more than four accusers allows them to legally charge Odiong with some of his alleged crimes no matter how much time had passed from when they purportedly occurred. He nevertheless argued on Tuesday that the state waited too long to file charges against him, opening the door for prosecutors to introduce hearsay testimony – inadmissible in most trial settings – about the number of accusers he has.
Court records filed in advance of the trial show prosecutors are ready to call a number of those accusers. They also areexpected to present evidence establishing that Odiong violated Catholic priests’ promise to practice sexual celibacy by fathering at least one child with a woman who had been a congregant of his.
That woman is not one of the three whom Odiong was charged with clerically abusing. Still, authorities argued that that particular child was living proof that Odiong had a pattern of pursuing female congregants.
Authorities initially arrested Odiong in July 2024 over allegations of possessing illicit digital images of a disrobed child that they found when investigating the complaint against him prompted by the Guardian’s reporting. But prosecutors ultimately never filed formal charges against him over those images.
Odiong’s attorney, Gerald Villarial, recently argued in court that a congregant concerned about her sick daughter had sent the images to the clergyman, the local news outlet KWTX reported. Villarial maintained that the photos were meant to display the girl’s skin irritations and a possible rash, and the parishioner asked Odiong to pray for the child’s healing, according to the outlet.
Villarial moved for all evidence derived from Odiong’s arrest on those images to be prohibited from being introduced at his trial. Yet the Texas state judge presiding over that case, Thomas West, denied that motion.
West also denied a separate motion to postpone Odiong’s trial, which started late on Tuesday morning with the prosecution and the defense questioning a pool of 100 prospective jurors. Questions included whether those prospective jurors could be impartial despite media coverage of the case – and if they believed pastors could exploit adults’ emotional dependency on them.
Odiong has denied wrongdoing. He has been held in custody in lieu of $5.5m bail since his arrest.
After gaining ordination into the Catholic priesthood in his native Nigeria in 1993, Odiong made a name for himself through holding prayer services after which some attenders reported recovering from significant ailments. The naturalized US citizen transferred to a region including Waco in 2006 under the auspices of the then Austin, Texas, bishop Gregory Aymond.
Odiong, among other things, worked in campus ministry at Baylor University in Waco and was the pastor of a church in West, Texas. He later evidently spent some time studying in Rome; and in 2015, he began working within the archdiocese of New Orleans, six years after Aymond had become archbishop there.
His main role in the New Orleans area was to be the pastor of St Anthony of Padua church in Luling, Louisiana. He also built a healing chapel next to St Anthony – named Our Lady of Guadalupe – after reportedly raising $600,000.
No later than 2019, church officials in Austin said they suspended Odiong from being able to minister in their area over allegations of misconduct with multiple women. Austin church officials did not publicly announce that but said they notified their counterparts in New Orleans.
Meanwhile, Aymond waited until December 2023 to similarly suspend Odiong from the ministry within the New Orleans archdiocese.
The archdiocese at the time cited misconduct with multiple women without revealing that they had been notified of the alleged behavior by diocesan officials in Austin at least four years earlier. Furthermore, Odiong’s New Orleans suspension came around the same time he had publicly made a string of anti-LGBTQ+ community remarks to his congregation as international church leaders were seeking to make the faith more inclusive.
Waco authorities criminally charged Odiong amid a debate within the Catholic church over whether to widen the definition of a vulnerable adult in the context of clergy abuse to encompass those who are under the spiritual authority of priests and then targeted for sexual contact by the clerics.
The church presently only considers a vulnerable adult to be anyone who is older than 18 while having “severe, intellectual, developmental or psychological disabilities”. Sexual misconduct with vulnerable adults or children is clearly defined as clergy abuse under modern Catholic church policies.
Aymond retired in February, a couple of months after the New Orleans archdiocese and its insurers agreed to pay $305m to abuse survivors to settle a bankruptcy protection case that the organization filed amid the financial fallout of the global church’s enduring clerical molestation scandal.
James Checchio, the former bishop of Metuchen, New Jersey, is Aymond’s successor as New Orleans’ archbishop.
The bigger issue here is anthony Odiong, accused of sexually abusing three female congregants in Waco,faces a maximum of 20 years in prison per. That changes the calculation.
What stands out is anthony Odiong, 57, faces charges of sexual assault in a state courthouse in Waco, Texas, involving three women whom he met while working there. That is the part worth paying attention to.
Considering he could receive between two and 20 years in prison – as well as a maximum $10,000 fine – on each charge if he is convicted at the end of a trial that could last a week or more, it raises some real questions about what happens next.
What stands out is a woman whom the Guardian did not interview subsequently brought a copy of the outlet’s story on Odiong to Waco police and reported that he had sexually assaulted her in 2012. That is the part worth paying attention to.
The detail about anthony Odiong, 57, faces charges of sexual assault in a state courthouse in Waco, Texas, involving three women whom he met while working there is something people should sit with.
So the bottom line is a woman whom the Guardian did not interview subsequently brought a copy of the outlet’s story on Odiong to Waco police and reported that he had sexually assaulted her in 2012. Wonder how this will land.
Basically many of those women’s cases, including ones from Louisiana, did not yield criminal counts. What matters is whether anything changes because of it.
Reading that anthony Odiong, accused of sexually abusing three female congregants in Waco,faces a maximum of 20 years in prison per — hard to argue with the logic there.
The detail about he could receive between two and 20 years in prison – as well as a maximum $10,000 fine – on each charge if he is convicted at the end of a trial that could last a week or more is something people should sit with.
The fact that anthony Odiong, 57, faces charges of sexual assault in a state courthouse in Waco, Texas, involving three women whom he met while working there really puts things into perspective.
The fact that anthony Odiong, accused of sexually abusing three female congregants in Waco,faces a maximum of 20 years in prison per really puts things into perspective.
Anthony Odiong, 57, faces charges of sexual assault in a state courthouse in Waco, Texas, involving three women whom he met while working there. Meanwhile he could receive between two and 20 years in prison – as well as a maximum $10,000 fine – on each charge if he is convicted at the end of a trial that could last a week or more.
Think about it: anthony Odiong, 57, faces charges of sexual assault in a state courthouse in Waco, Texas, involving three women whom he met while working there. That speaks volumes.
Basically a woman whom the Guardian did not interview subsequently brought a copy of the outlet’s story on Odiong to Waco police and reported that he had sexually assaulted her in 2012. What matters is whether anything changes because of it.
Reading that a woman whom the Guardian did not interview subsequently brought a copy of the outlet’s story on Odiong to Waco police and reported that he had sexually assaulted her in 2012 — hard to argue with the logic there.