{"id":1113,"date":"2026-05-16T02:39:41","date_gmt":"2026-05-16T02:39:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/usglobalnews.com\/?p=1113"},"modified":"2026-05-16T02:39:42","modified_gmt":"2026-05-16T02:39:42","slug":"supreme-court-is-death-knell-for-virginias-democratic-friendly-congressional-maps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/usglobalnews.com\/?p=1113","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\n Law<\/a>
\n <\/h3>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps<\/h1>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

By\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n \"Nina
\n <\/a>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\n Nina Totenberg
\n <\/a>\n <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

,\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n

\n
\n Zoe Sobel
\n <\/a>\n <\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\n <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

\"The<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n

\n The U.S. Supreme Court
\n
\n Andrew Harnik\/Getty Images
\n <\/b>
\n hide caption<\/b><\/b>\n <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

toggle caption<\/b><\/b>\n <\/div>\n


\n Andrew Harnik\/Getty Images
\n <\/span>\n<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Friday to allow Virginia to use a new congressional map that favored Democrats in all but one of the state’s U.S. House seats. The map was a key part of Democrats’ effort to counter the Republican redistricting wave set off by President Trump.<\/p>\n

The new map was drawn by Democrats and approved by Virginia voters in an April referendum<\/u><\/a>. But on May 8, the Supreme Court of Virginia in a 4-to-3 vote<\/u><\/a> declared the referendum, and by extension the new map, null and void<\/u><\/a> because lawmakers failed to follow the proper procedures to get the issue on the ballot, violating the state constitution.<\/p>\n

Virginia Democrats and the state’s attorney general then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to put into effect the map approved by the voters, which yields four more likely Democratic congressional seats. In their emergency application<\/u><\/a>, they argued the Virginia Supreme Court was “deeply mistaken” in its decision on “critical issues of federal law with profound practical importance to the Nation.” Further, they asserted the decision “overrode the will of the people” by ordering Virginia to “conduct its election with the congressional districts that the people rejected.”<\/p>\n

Republican legislators countered<\/u><\/a> that it would be improper for the U.S. Supreme Court to wade into a purely state law controversy \u2014 especially since the Democrats had not raised any federal claims in the lower court.<\/p>\n

Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Republicans without explanation leaving in place the state court ruling that voided the Democratic-friendly maps.<\/p>\n

The court’s decision not to intervene was its latest in emergency requests for intervention on redistricting issues. In December, the high court OK’d Texas<\/u><\/a> using a gerrymandered map that could help the GOP win five more seats in the U.S. House. In February, the court allowed California<\/u><\/a> to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map, adopted to offset Texas’s map. Then in March, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the redrawing<\/u><\/a> of a New York map expected to flip a Republican congressional district Democratic.<\/p>\n

And perhaps most importantly, in April, the high court ruled<\/u><\/a> that a Louisiana congressional map was a racial gerrymander and must be redrawn. That decision immediately set off a flurry of redistricting efforts, particularly in the South, where Republican legislators immediately began redrawing congressional maps to eliminate long established majority Black and Hispanic districts.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n