May 19, 2026

8 thoughts on “Marka-i-Haq a ‘defining landmark in the nation’s journey’: ISPR

  1. The ISPR calling it a ‘defining landmark’ feels like propaganda to build a narrative of victory, but I’m just glad the conflict ended quickly without too many casualties.

  2. Field Marshal Asim Munir’s leadership during the brief war really showed Pakistan’s strategic maturity, especially how they handled the cyber and information domains.

  3. I still remember the tension in April last year after the Pahalgam attack — it’s good to see the military acknowledging the disinformation campaigns India ran against us.

  4. Marka-i-Haq is a fitting name, given how the military exposed India’s false flag narratives. The world now knows who the real aggressor was.

  5. The ceasefire on May 10 came as a relief, but I worry that glorifying this as a ‘Battle of Truth’ might embolden more aggressive posturing on both sides.

  6. Interesting how the ISPR highlighted hybrid threats like proxy terrorism—clearly they’re preparing the public for a long-term information war, not just a conventional one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *