May 19, 2026

13 thoughts on “US attorney general defends press subpoenas over classified leaks

  1. Blanche can say he’s defending national security all he wants, but subpoenaing journalists for reporting on Iran war plans is a direct threat to press freedom.

  2. If the leaks were legitimate national security threats, I get it. But going after WSJ for reporting on Iran seems like a way to avoid accountability for failed policies.

  3. Finally someone willing to crack down on these leaks. Classified information is classified for a reason—if reporters break the law, they should face consequences.

  4. The irony of using X to announce press subpoenas while complaining about leaks is not lost on me. Blanche should focus on real threats instead of reporters.

  5. I’m curious what exact information was leaked that justified a grand jury subpoena. The public has a right to know if the administration is hiding something about Iran.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *