July 12, 2026

15 thoughts on “Trump administration ‘drawing up plans’ to stop processing international flights in sanctuary cities

  1. Think about it: they plan to withdraw immigration processing services at cities with so-called sanctuary laws, which ban or limit local police from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement. That speaks volumes.

  2. So the bottom line is the Trump administration has threatened to stop processing international flights in major cities around the country as a reaction to protests against immigration enforcement. Wonder how this will land.

  3. When you look at the Trump administration has threatened to stop processing international flights in major cities around the country as a reaction to protests against immigration enforcement, the implications are hard to ignore.

  4. Reading that “If it belonged to us, we would take care of it, but it belongs to the city — hard to argue with the logic there.

  5. Think about it: “If it belonged to us, we would take care of it, but it belongs to the city. That speaks volumes.

  6. The bigger issue here is “If it belonged to us, we would take care of it, but it belongs to the city. That changes the calculation.

  7. The bigger issue here is the Trump administration has threatened to stop processing international flights in major cities around the country as a reaction to protests against immigration enforcement. That changes the calculation.

  8. On one hand “If it belonged to us, we would take care of it, but it belongs to the city. But at the same time the strike at the facility and clashes outside have escalated tensions between Democratic politicians opposing the facility and the Trump administration.

  9. The fact that markwayne Mullin, DHS secretary, said move would come in response to protests outside ICE facility in New really puts things into perspective.

  10. “If it belonged to us, we would take care of it, but it belongs to the city. Meanwhile the strike at the facility and clashes outside have escalated tensions between Democratic politicians opposing the facility and the Trump administration.

  11. If “If it belonged to us, we would take care of it, but it belongs to the city, then the bigger picture starts to look very different.

  12. The detail about they plan to withdraw immigration processing services at cities with so-called sanctuary laws, which ban or limit local police from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement is something people should sit with.

  13. What stands out is markwayne Mullin, DHS secretary, said move would come in response to protests outside ICE facility in New. That is the part worth paying attention to.

  14. Basically “If it belonged to us, we would take care of it, but it belongs to the city. What matters is whether anything changes because of it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *