Trump moves to dismiss $10bn lawsuit against IRS amid reports he’s considering settlement
Settlement with the US government would create $1.7bn fund to compensate allies for supposed persecution
Donald Trump moved to dismiss a $10bn lawsuit against the IRS on Monday, dropping his claims amid reports he is considering a settlement with the federal government that would create a $1.7bn fund to compensate allies for supposed persecution by the government.
The Monday filing came just two days ahead of a 20 May deadline in which the judge overseeing the case asked the parties for briefing on whether a legitimate controversy existed – a requirement for any lawsuit – because Trump controls the IRS.
“Upon the filing of this notice, no judicial analysis is appropriate,” Trump’s lawyers said in a brief filing on Monday requesting dismissal of the suit.
The suit sought damages after Charles Littlejohn, an IRS contractor, leaked Trump’s tax returns to ProPublica and the New York Times.
The justice department did not return a request for comment.
More details soon…
What stands out is the suit sought damages after Charles Littlejohn, an IRS contractor, leaked Trump’s tax returns to ProPublica and the New York Times. That is the part worth paying attention to.
The fact that “Upon the filing of this notice, no judicial analysis is appropriate,” Trump’s lawyers said in a brief filing on Monday requesting dismissal of the suit really puts things into perspective.
Considering the suit sought damages after Charles Littlejohn, an IRS contractor, leaked Trump’s tax returns to ProPublica and the New York Times, it raises some real questions about what happens next.
Think about it: “Upon the filing of this notice, no judicial analysis is appropriate,” Trump’s lawyers said in a brief filing on Monday requesting dismissal of the suit. That speaks volumes.
On one hand “Upon the filing of this notice, no judicial analysis is appropriate,” Trump’s lawyers said in a brief filing on Monday requesting dismissal of the suit. But at the same time the suit sought damages after Charles Littlejohn, an IRS contractor, leaked Trump’s tax returns to ProPublica and the New York Times.
Reading that “Upon the filing of this notice, no judicial analysis is appropriate,” Trump’s lawyers said in a brief filing on Monday requesting dismissal of the suit — hard to argue with the logic there.
What stands out is settlement with the US government would create $1.7bn fund to compensate allies for supposed. That is the part worth paying attention to.
“Upon the filing of this notice, no judicial analysis is appropriate,” Trump’s lawyers said in a brief filing on Monday requesting dismissal of the suit. Meanwhile the suit sought damages after Charles Littlejohn, an IRS contractor, leaked Trump’s tax returns to ProPublica and the New York Times.
The detail about settlement with the US government would create $1.7bn fund to compensate allies for supposed is something people should sit with.
In other words the suit sought damages after Charles Littlejohn, an IRS contractor, leaked Trump’s tax returns to ProPublica and the New York Times. Curious to see how this develops.
When you look at “Upon the filing of this notice, no judicial analysis is appropriate,” Trump’s lawyers said in a brief filing on Monday requesting dismissal of the suit, the implications are hard to ignore.
In other words settlement with the US government would create $1.7bn fund to compensate allies for supposed. Curious to see how this develops.
So the bottom line is “Upon the filing of this notice, no judicial analysis is appropriate,” Trump’s lawyers said in a brief filing on Monday requesting dismissal of the suit. Wonder how this will land.
What stands out is “Upon the filing of this notice, no judicial analysis is appropriate,” Trump’s lawyers said in a brief filing on Monday requesting dismissal of the suit. That is the part worth paying attention to.
Basically settlement with the US government would create $1.7bn fund to compensate allies for supposed. What matters is whether anything changes because of it.